OasisDating review

What are The Best Random Chat Sites? The Top 10 Random Video Chat Sites

What are The Best Random Chat Sites? The Top 10 Random Video Chat Sites

Have you ever wondered what is the best random video chat site on the Internet? Random video chats sites are not a new thing. Chatroulette, created in 2010, was the first one. But many people have launched alternative services during the last two decades.

Random video chat sites are an exciting way to meet people online and to connect with strangers with just the click of a button. Although they’ve been around for years, they are still extremely popular worldwide. These sites all have pros and cons. Some of them offer innovative features while other ones will guarantee you find a partner as they have a huge volume of daily users. On most of them, you can start a random video chat without login nor registration.

This design has been used in commerce to provide dating services long before the Domain Name was registered

This design has been used in commerce to provide dating services long before the Domain Name was registered

Complainant states that it also offers dating services under other trademarks that are characterized by the fanciful graphic of a heart design with two little horns and a tail (like a “devil”)plainant registered EUTMs in 2010 and 2011 (EUTM Nos. 008560971, 010175073 and 010175578) using this graphic design, and Complainant has submitted evidence of the use of this design logo in different countries (Denmark, France, Spain and the United Kingdom)plainant states that the webpage linked to the Domain Name copies the design of the heart with two little horns and a tail that characterizes Complainant’s dating services.

In view of these circumstances, Complainant contends that Respondent seems to have been inspired by Complainant’s trademarks and copied the dominant element of the CHEEKYLOVERS mark and the design of Complainant’s other EUTMs

This mixture leads consumers to confusion and makes them believe mistakenly that the dating services provided by the website linked to the Domain Name are provided by Complainant.

Complainant asserts that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name because (i) Respondent is not a licensee or affiliate of Complainant, nor has Respondent received any permission or consent to use Complainant’s trademark; (ii) Complainant has prior rights in its trademark which predate Respondent’s registration of the Domain Name; and (iii) Respondent is not commonly known by the trademark.

All search results